NO TOXIC ROCKETS FOR ME

Ban on space weapons is only way to prevent calamity in space

by Bruce Gagnon / Portland Press Herald /August 31, 2025

I read with great interest [the Portland Press Herald] article entitled HIJACKED SATELLITES AND ORBITING SPACE WEAPONS: In the 21st century, space is the new battlefield. It was full of half-truths and manipulations that we've come to expect from the Pentagon and the military industrial complex.

While in the Air Force during the Vietnam war, I read the infamous Pentagon Papers that revealed how our government lied to the public, the Congress and the media to create the support for the war. We witnessed a similar story repeated in 2003 with 'shock and awe' in Iraq and supposed weapons of mass destruction.

I've been coordinating the Global Network since its founding in 1992 while then living in Florida. In 1997 we obtained a copy of the Space Command's internal document 'Vision for 2020' that declared the US would 'control space, dominate space and deny other nations access to space'. Since that time the Pentagon and the aerospace industry have done everything possible to create a new arms race in space that they long ago stated would be 'the largest industrial project in human history'. https://thecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Vision2020.pdf

For more than 30 years China and Russia have gone to the United Nations proposing a new space treaty called PAROS (Prevention of an Arms Race in Space). At the general assembly in a vote on the non-binding resolution it overwhelming passes despite US and Israel voting NO. The treaty proposal is then sent to Geneva’s Conference on Disarmament for negotiation. There the US and Israel block the treaty. The official position of the US (through Democrat and Republican administrations) has been, 'There are no weapons in space, we don't need a new treaty'. https://www.ungeneva.org/en/about/topics/disarmament

The Global Network's position has always been 'close the door to the barn before the horse gets out'. But the US has always intended to be the dominant power in space. That is how wars are created.

China and Russia have steadily responded telling the US that they will not allow Washington to be the 'Master of Space' - a slogan over the door way at the Space Command HQ in Colorado.

NASA has long predicted that war in space will create the Kessler Syndrome - a cascading field of space debris as satellites are destroyed. The outcome would be that much of the Earth would go dark as so many things in our high-tech civilization are linked to space satellites. https://www.space.com/kessler-syndrome-space-debris

The Pentagon has a plan though. Its strategy is to fund a slew of launch providers around the world to, in a short-time during a war in space, put into orbit new military mini-satellites to replace those that were destroyed.

One such potential launch provider is blueShift Aerospace in Brunswick. The CEO of blueShift, once in answer to a question from me, admitted that his corporation was being funded by NASA and the US Space Force to launch mini-sats in a time of crisis in order to keep China and Russia from filling up the already overly congested Lower Earth Orbit (LEO). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGCujmkYCtU

The only way to peace and security in space is via a new treaty to ban all weapons in space. We delay such a move at our own peril.

~ Bruce K. Gagnon is the coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space and lives in Brunswick, Maine.

Another Maine town may block a rocket company from coming in

by Bill Trotter / Bangor Daily News / February 20, 2025

An upcoming referendum vote in a Down East town could derail the hopes of a Brunswick company that is working to develop rockets for sending satellites into orbit.

Voters in the Washington County town of Steuben will decide on March 11 whether to ban commercial rocket launches, after bluShift Aerospace approached local officials a few years ago to see if they might be willing to have the company base some of its operations there.

BluShift approached Steuben after the company’s initial interest in Jonesport ran into strong opposition from residents in that town. The potential impact of rocket launches on commercial fishing — which company officials have said would be minimal — was the top concern cited by Jonesport residents.

The company wants to build small rockets, which would use environmentally friendly fuel it has developed, to launch satellites into orbits above the earth’s north and south poles. The relatively sparsely developed coastline in Washington County, and the shoreline’s southern exposure to the sea, are well-suited for the company’s plans, bluShift officials have said.

But the vote on March 11, if approved by voters, would bar the company from either building rockets in Steuben or launching them off the town’s coastline, which bluShift said it likely would do from specialized barges that would come and go between the town’s waterfront and launch sites a few miles offshore.

Larch Hanson, a local resident who owns and operates a local seaweed company, spearheaded the citizen’s petition to get the proposed rocket ordinance on the ballot. He said that other rocket companies also are interested in Maine, and that the issue is bigger than just whether bluShift might expand to Steuben.

In a written statement, Hanson said that rocket manufacturing, and possibly retrieving spent rockets from the ocean, is dangerous work. He cited the accidental discharge last summer of toxic fire-retardant foam at Brunswick Landing, where bluShift is headquartered, as something he would fear if rocket manufacturing came to Steuben.

The head of bluShift “and those other CEO’s of rocket launching companies who will come tumbling out of the Trojan Horse, once it’s been wheeled through the gates of our community, will never be held accountable for the damage they do to our air, waters, soils, and health,” Hanson said.

The vote is one of several items residents will decide on March 11, along with the election of two new selectmen to serve on the three-seat board, and a separate vote on a proposed local food ordinance.

Clerks at the Steuben town office provided information about what will be on the March 11 ballot, but directed further questions to members of the Select Board. Personal contact information for the board members could not immediately be found, and none of them returned a message left at the town office on Wednesday.

Sascha Deri, the CEO of bluShift, said that the company still believes Steuben could be a good place to assemble and launch rockets. But he also said that the company is still in the development phase of proving its proprietary fuel system is viable for regular, small-rocket launches. It has not yet made any financial obligations in Steuben or made a final decision about where it wants to expand along the coast, he said.

“We feel that it is premature and shortsighted for a town to consider passage of an ordinance that would essentially shut down an entire industry from operating within its borders,” Deri said.

He said his company’s technology does not harm the environment, and both the scale and frequency of its anticipated launches would have minimal impact on fishermen, who represent a significant portion of the state’s coastal economy. Fishermen also could develop additional sources of income by assisting bluShift with transporting and retrieving its rockets offshore, he said.

If the company’s technology proves to be viable and attracts adequate capital investment — and if local voters want it — it hopes to expand to Steuben with a manufacturing facility, mission control and offshore launch program, Deri said. Such an expansion could directly lead to the creation of 100 to 150 high-paying jobs and could keep younger Mainers interested in STEM-related careers from moving out of state, he said.

“We believe the town should vote against this particular ordinance, since passage would very likely have negative impacts that residents did not consider,” Deri said. “Instead, we believe the town should take the time to carefully draft an ordinance that allows for local job creation and ensures that sustainable Maine businesses can thrive in the community.”

Around Town segment Nov 9 WERU Community Radio with Lisa Savage & Amy Browne

Photos from our protest at the Maine Space Conference Nov 6 in Portland

More info

Our ad campaign includes a 1/4 page print ad and :30 radio spot ⏬

Rocket-ad3.wav

Sign up for updates on proposals

to build rocket launch sites in maine

who we are

Nature lovers opposed to building polluting rocket launch sites in Maine. We monitored & resisted the rush to pass "emergency" legislation to create a public-private partnership for rocket launch sites in our state. In April, 2022, LD 1923 was signed into law by Gov. Janet Mills after passing the House "under the gavel" i.e. without a voice vote.

Video of our talk at the Common Ground Fair in Unity where bluShift Aerospace CEO Sascha Deri showed up to call us liars.

We're not lying, but Maine Space Corporation supporters probably were when they assured legislators that plans for a rocket launch site off the coast would only be used for civilian purposes. At our talk, Deri admitted he's accepting funding from both NASA and the U.S. Space Force, and expects to launch satellites for the military. And VALT, another Maine supporter of building launch sites, is already at work on hypersonic weapons for the Pentagon.

GHG EMISSIONS

Rocket launches contribute to climate crisis with greenhouse gas emissions, and they further harm the environment with toxic fallout from launches that falls to Earth. They also harm the ozone layer protecting us from Sun's radiation. By the way, despite what supporters of this business scheme tell you, even "bio" fuels have emissions that are significant.

TOXIC FALLOUT

When rocket launches go wrong -- as they frequently do -- chemicals rain down on land and sea as highly toxic materials burn up.

In case of fires at the rocket launch site, large scale storage of PFAS foam is to be expected. Maine already has a severe PFAS contamination problem on agricultural land across the state.

DISTURBED WILDLIFE

The commercial fishing community of Jonesport has already pushed back on plans to launch rockets near their fishing grounds. The effect on birds, other animals, and plant life near launch sites is pressure on their ability to survive. Large numbers of birds were killed after a SpaceX rocket launch last summer in New Mexico.

Is this what we want for Maine?

MILITARY USE

LD 1923's sponsor Rep. Daughtry insists that no military uses are planned for rocket launch sites in Maine. But in every location we've studied, the same promises were made and not kept.

In Kodiak, Alaska 20 years ago one launch site was built with developers claiming it was only for civilian purposes. There are now multiple sites there being used by the Pentagon and the Israeli military. Meanwhile, the jobs that were promised for the project never developed. Sites are staffed when launches happen by outsiders who leave after the event. Only custodial and security staff jobs are available to the local community.

Recently a SpaceX launch of satellites saw 40 of them fall out of the atmosphere due to a solar storm. In their statement about their response to the incident, SpaceX stressed their close cooperation with the Pentagon:

The Starlink team commanded the satellites into a safe-mode where they would fly edge-on (like a sheet of paper) to minimize drag — to effectively “take cover from the storm”— the Space Force’s 18th Space Control Squadron

and LeoLabs to provide updates on the satellites based on ground radars.

“We’re trying to be a step ahead of some of our competitors, not only in Canada but also in Alaska,” Terry Shehata, executive director of the Maine Space Grant Consortium, told lawmakers in Augusta on Feb 1 (video here).

“We want to do this as quickly as possible so we can enter the marketplace.”

A NEW ZEALAND LAUNCH SITE HAS BEEN MILITARIZED SINCE IT WAS BUILT

OPPOSITION TO A PROPOSED ROCKET LAUNCH SITE IN HAWAII

AN ALASKA LAUNCH SITE HAS BEEN MILITARIZED SINCE IT WAS BUILT